HOME ORGANIC SEARCH SEO TIPS DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH
 
FIND US
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to Marketing Jive
 Subscribe to our feed.
ADVERTISE
Marketing-Jive, formerly SEO-Space, was established in 2006 and since then we have noticed significant increases in both traffic and feed subscribers. If you want to promote your business to thousands of visitors who understand digital marketing, you’ve come to the right place. Sign up and start receiving qualified leads right now. Your ad will be visible on every unique page on our blog.
Glossary of SEO Terms
Search Engine Market Share (US)
Organic Search / SEO Tips
SEO Paradigm Shift: Google Prefers Dynamic URLs Over Static URLs?
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Came across this post which will have large implications for our clients and all websites for that matter. According to Barry Schwartz at SE Land Google posted a blog entry telling Webmasters not to rewrite dynamic URLs to be static. This is an entire paradigm shift into what we have learned and been told by the engines.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html

Key Takeaways from the Google Post:

  • static URLs might have a slight advantage in terms of clickthrough rates because users can easily read the urls
  • the decision to use database-driven websites does not imply a significant disadvantage in terms of indexing and ranking
  • Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.

http://searchengineland.com/080923-090542.php

Labels:

posted by Jody @ Tuesday, September 23, 2008  
3 Comments:
  • At 12:03 PM, Blogger Rob said…

    Hmm

    Unless this is a recent change, even up to a couple months ago I've found dynamic sites which have been converted to static (via a rewriter) tend to do better than the dynamic version.

    And in many cases, the rewrite rules are VERY simple - no complex rules required.

    Plus, as you've said, static URLs tend to have a higher CTR.

    So based on that, why wouldn't you want to rewrite? The other thing to consider is, even though google is the biggest, they aren't the only player. And we already know other engines do have issues with dynamic URLs.

     
  • At 8:37 AM, Blogger Jody said…

    Agreed. As long as you know how to apply the proper rewrite rules, a cleaner, static appearing URL is still better in my books. I agree with the fact that while Google has the most market share, they're not the only player. Cleaner, shorter static URLs are still the way to go.

     
  • At 8:45 AM, Blogger Chris said…

    I'm just down the hall, but I'm on side too. I think that's a post directed at those who can't do rewrites or use their CMS. They've been torn to shreads on Sphinn and in some of the other forums as well.

     
Post a Comment
<< Home
 
Top B2B Blogs    
Invesp landing page optimization
About Me
Name: Jody
Home: Kelowna, BC, Canada
About Me: SEO guy by day, family man 24/7.
Previous Posts
Marketing Jive Vault of Posts
Online Marketing Resources
Blogs We Like
Hockey Fanatic
JodyNimetz.com
Ask.com Blog
Comparison Engines
Matt Cutts

TechCrunch
Techdirt
VentureBeat
Yahoo Search Blog

Add to Technorati Favorites

Marketing Jive Home

|

Subscribe | Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map

Add to GoogleAdd to My Yahoo!Add to BloglinesAdd to NetvibesAdd to Windows Live